Proposition 1: One Church
The
centerpiece of Thomas Campbell's Declaration and Address is the
thirteen propositions for unity. We will begin our discussion of these
propositions with Proposition 1:
It is this church that the Lord prayed to be one in John 17, that Paul admonished to have no divisions (1 Cor 1:10) and to make every effort toward unity (Eph 4:3). This church has no earthly headquarters. It has no international ruling body. It has no creed except the Word of God.
Today the members of this "one church" are divided into numerous manmade organizations with manmade creeds and manmade ruling bodies that maintain the manmade walls between the manmade organizations. Can this be what Jesus intended when he prayed for them to be one, as he is one with the Father?
Christians who contemplate this sad picture today are moved to do something to make it right. They are immediately faced with the difficulty of the present situation. Campbell professes that the church consists of all those in every place
(1) that profess their faith in Christ and obedience to him in all things according to the scriptures, and
(2) that manifest the same by their tempers and conduct.
In (1), did Campbell mean that we must perfectly obey every scripture? Note that's not what he said. Instead, he lists two things they must profess. That is, they must profess faith in Christ, and they must profess obedience to the scriptures.
In (2), Campbell says they must live consistently with the professions in (1). So, did he mean here that we must perfectly obey every scripture? I don't think so. I think he meant we must live as those who intend to obey every scripture.
Regardless of what Campbell meant, it is clear from history that those who followed after him defined the boundaries of the church in increasingly narrow terms since he wrote those words. To reverse that trend and to move toward increased unity, we must learn to accept in unreserved fellowship people who (in our opinion) are absolutely wrong about some things. The only alternative, bringing everyone to complete agreement on every biblical subject, seems unattainable without miraculous intervention by God. We may have to wait for the second coming of Christ to see that happen. Meanwhile, we need to broaden our minds and extend grace. After all, we may need some grace in this area also.
I don't know how far we should go in accepting people with "wrong" (in our opinion) beliefs. There clearly must be limits on that. Perhaps we should start with the easier subjects first. By bringing down the first few walls, we may build momentum that will inspire others to help as we tackle more difficult topics.
The Christian Standard has begun a three part series discussing the three descriptive terms "essentially, intentionally, and constitutionally" used to describe the oneness of the church. I eagerly anticipate the second and third in the series.
That the church of Christ upon earth is essentially, intentionally, and constitutionally one; consisting of all those in every place that profess their faith in Christ and obedience to him in all things according to the scriptures, and that manifest the same by their tempers and conduct, and of none else as none else can be truly and properly called christians.There is one body (Eph 4:4) which is the church (Col 1:18). People are added to it when they believe in Jesus, repent of their sins, and are baptized for forgiveness of those sins (Acts 2:38-40) and are adopted by God (Eph 1:5) as his sons. This church is not an organization made by men. No man has the authority to decide who is in this church and who is not. All who are adopted by God are added by God to his church.
It is this church that the Lord prayed to be one in John 17, that Paul admonished to have no divisions (1 Cor 1:10) and to make every effort toward unity (Eph 4:3). This church has no earthly headquarters. It has no international ruling body. It has no creed except the Word of God.
Today the members of this "one church" are divided into numerous manmade organizations with manmade creeds and manmade ruling bodies that maintain the manmade walls between the manmade organizations. Can this be what Jesus intended when he prayed for them to be one, as he is one with the Father?
Christians who contemplate this sad picture today are moved to do something to make it right. They are immediately faced with the difficulty of the present situation. Campbell professes that the church consists of all those in every place
(1) that profess their faith in Christ and obedience to him in all things according to the scriptures, and
(2) that manifest the same by their tempers and conduct.
In (1), did Campbell mean that we must perfectly obey every scripture? Note that's not what he said. Instead, he lists two things they must profess. That is, they must profess faith in Christ, and they must profess obedience to the scriptures.
In (2), Campbell says they must live consistently with the professions in (1). So, did he mean here that we must perfectly obey every scripture? I don't think so. I think he meant we must live as those who intend to obey every scripture.
Regardless of what Campbell meant, it is clear from history that those who followed after him defined the boundaries of the church in increasingly narrow terms since he wrote those words. To reverse that trend and to move toward increased unity, we must learn to accept in unreserved fellowship people who (in our opinion) are absolutely wrong about some things. The only alternative, bringing everyone to complete agreement on every biblical subject, seems unattainable without miraculous intervention by God. We may have to wait for the second coming of Christ to see that happen. Meanwhile, we need to broaden our minds and extend grace. After all, we may need some grace in this area also.
I don't know how far we should go in accepting people with "wrong" (in our opinion) beliefs. There clearly must be limits on that. Perhaps we should start with the easier subjects first. By bringing down the first few walls, we may build momentum that will inspire others to help as we tackle more difficult topics.
The Christian Standard has begun a three part series discussing the three descriptive terms "essentially, intentionally, and constitutionally" used to describe the oneness of the church. I eagerly anticipate the second and third in the series.
2 Comments:
Alan:
Great subject and good comementary.
The question of where to draw the line is one of the most important questions you could ask. The answer is difficult to determine.
My first thought would be to start at baptism, but I'm not sure where the end should be...
-Clarke
Hey Clarke,
I'm thinking that the line has to be drawn at conversion. We'll be getting to another of the propositions soon that basically says that. In other words, if a person has met the requirements for conversion, I should wholeheartedly embrace him regardless of disagreements on other matters. Of course that wouldn't include situations like 1 Cor 5:11.
Alan
Post a Comment
<< Home